From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA21506; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:33:58 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA22338 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:33:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mta09-svc.ntlworld.com (mta09-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.49]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8CMXurG007227 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:33:56 +0200 Received: from [80.4.70.84] by mta09-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP id <20040912223500.QZNZ1100.mta09-svc.ntlworld.com@[80.4.70.84]>; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 23:35:00 +0100 Message-ID: <4144CED4.7040704@ntlworld.com> Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 23:33:56 +0100 From: "chris.danx" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: snh1@cec.wustl.edu CC: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml-Lua interface References: <3069.128.252.41.44.1094927863.squirrel@clarion.cec.wustl.edu> <41438B58.70809@ntlworld.com> <2034.172.16.0.166.1094961926.squirrel@clarion.cec.wustl.edu> In-Reply-To: <2034.172.16.0.166.1094961926.squirrel@clarion.cec.wustl.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4144CED4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; ntlworld:99 caml-list:01 snh:99 cec:99 chris:01 chris:01 bindings:01 licence:03 wrote:03 interface:03 probably:05 i'm:07 consider:09 license:10 difference:12 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk snh1@cec.wustl.edu wrote: >>Would you consider releasing it under the same conditions as Lua 5.x? >>It's no big deal, just wondered. >> >>Chris > > > Probably, but I don't see any real difference from the BSD-ish licence I > was using (though I'm not a lawyer, or anything remotely approaching one). > Can I ask why? I just like bindings to software to be under the same license as the software itself whenever possible. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners