From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FADBC2F for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:02:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iAQH2j9C007429 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:02:45 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA11789 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:02:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from [128.93.11.101] (buzet.inria.fr [128.93.11.101]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iAQH1iNt007326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:01:44 +0100 Message-ID: <41A76177.5030804@inria.fr> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:01:43 +0100 From: Alain Frisch User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041119) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jacques Garrigue Cc: warplayer@free.fr, caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why doesn't ocamlopt detect a missing ; after failwith statement? References: <1101438486.9291.138.camel@pelican.wigram> <20041126.142525.93385094.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <004201c4d386$cc6fe4a0$19b0e152@warp> <20041126.234236.32629560.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20041126.234236.32629560.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41A761B5.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41A76178.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; frisch:01 frisch:01 caml-list:01 ocamlopt:01 failwith:01 wrote:01 misleading:01 jacques:01 argument:01 argument:01 alain:02 alain:02 garrigue:03 raise:03 raise:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: Jacques Garrigue wrote: > # raise Exit 3;; > ^ > Warning X: this argument is passed to a never returning function. In my opinion, the text of the warning is misleading. "Exit" is passed to a never returning function, and this is ok. The problem is that "raise Exit" is applied to an argument but it cannot evaluate to a function. -- Alain