From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B341BBC51 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:17:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from ideliver.epitech.net (deliver.epitech.net [163.5.0.25]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id iASNHb8L022769 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:17:37 +0100 Received: from epita.fr ([10.42.1.60]) by ideliver.epitech.net (SAVSMTP 3.1.2.35) with SMTP id M2004112900140824526 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:14:08 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (gate-ssh [10.42.0.104]) by epita.fr id iASNHUT16960 for EPITA Paris France Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:17:30 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41AA5C8C.2010503@free.fr> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:17:32 +0100 From: Elthariel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Could be Caml a good language for sound manipulation ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 41AA5C91.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 short:01 caml:02 caml:02 partially:02 guess:02 langage:03 quite:06 quite:06 plugins:06 i'm:08 i'm:08 think:10 question:11 doesn't:12 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: Hello "les Cémaliens", I'm quite new in oCaml world, I partially learnt it in my school (EPITA / Paris) and I'm going to finish this next year. I'm not really ease in english so my question will be short : do you think Caml coul be a nice langage for sound manipulation implementation, as Synthetizers, effects plugins ? I doesn't ask for answer in term of performance which should be I guess quite good :p, but more in term of software design and language facility. Thank you for paying me attention. Elthariel.