From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA21905; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 14:14:15 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA21960 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 14:14:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from saul.cis.upenn.edu (SAUL.CIS.UPENN.EDU [158.130.12.4]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f99CEC528489; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 14:14:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saul.cis.upenn.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f99CE4x04202; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 08:14:04 -0400 (EDT) To: "Dave Berry" cc: "Maxence Guesdon" , "Jerome Vouillon" , "Francois Pottier" , caml-list@inria.fr Reply-to: bcpierce@cis.upenn.edu Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 09 Oct 2001 12:40:36 +0100. <8E31D6933A2FE64F8AE3CC1381EEDCE7140153@NT.kal.com> Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 08:14:04 EDT Message-ID: <4200.1002629644@saul.cis.upenn.edu> From: "Benjamin C. Pierce" Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > How about a variation on Jerome's suggestion: > > - The comment is before the element: > (*> fun 1 *) > val f : t > (*> fun 2 *) > val g : u > - The comment is after the element: > val f : t > (*< fun 1 *) > val g : u > (*< fun 2 *) Let me enter a plea here for *not* introducing a dozen different kinds of funny markers in comments. One of the nice features of the original proposal was that it doesn't uglify the source code very much -- please let's keep that. For the record, I like Jerome's idea of using just indentation to figure out which comment goes with which declaration. B ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr