From: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: OCaml List <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:34:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421532A1-E2CA-404F-8387-E11DA9B3DE79@erratique.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m49od0d2up3.fsf@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi>
Le 18 nov. 08 à 11:29, Erkki Seppala a écrit :
> For example I prefer using the least amount of opening of modules,
> to make it easier to see where the values come from
Same here. This is why I'm a little bit sceptical about this hierarchy.
With the current standard library if I suddenly want to use
Int32.of_int, I know I just need to type Int32.of_int in my source.
With your proposal I need to remember that it is in Data.Numeric and
go at the beginning of my file to open it or write
Data.Numeric.Int32.of_int, to me this brings bureaucracy without any
benefit. And lack of bureaucracy is one of the reasons I like ocaml
(and dislike java for example).
Besides Hierarchies are anyway limited in their descriptive power and
one day you'll find something that will fit in two places, Rope is
already an example being both Data.Persistent and Data.Text.
Thus my proposal would be to _present_ them as a hierarchy (but even
here a mean to tag/browse the modules with/by keywords would do a
better job) but keep the actual module structure of Batteries as flat
as possible, everything just under the toplevel Batteries. When I code
I really don't want to have to think about all these open directives
that essentially bring nothing.
Best,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-18 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-18 9:56 David Teller
2008-11-18 10:06 ` [Caml-list] " Richard Jones
2008-11-18 10:21 ` Zheng Li
2008-11-18 11:22 ` David Teller
2008-11-18 12:52 ` Zheng Li
2008-11-18 14:10 ` [Caml-list] " Alain Frisch
2008-11-18 14:19 ` David Teller
2008-11-19 3:06 ` Yaron Minsky
2008-11-19 3:47 ` Till Varoquaux
2008-11-19 10:57 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-19 18:05 ` Stéphane Glondu
2008-11-20 0:14 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-18 10:29 ` [Caml-list] " Erkki Seppala
2008-11-18 11:34 ` Daniel Bünzli [this message]
2008-11-18 11:47 ` Thomas Gazagnaire
2008-11-18 12:15 ` David Teller
2008-11-18 12:32 ` Richard Jones
2008-11-18 12:56 ` David Teller
2008-11-19 13:38 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-19 17:37 ` Richard Jones
2008-11-23 10:32 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
[not found] ` <9b415f950811180428x2de94a64q6fa92887f8e00705@mail.gmail.com>
2008-11-18 12:51 ` David Teller
2008-12-19 11:00 ` Benedikt Grundmann
2009-01-05 10:40 ` David Teller
2008-11-18 13:24 ` Daniel Bünzli
2008-11-18 14:46 ` David Teller
2008-11-18 12:40 ` David Teller
2008-11-18 13:31 ` Dario Teixeira
2008-11-18 14:23 ` David Teller
2008-11-18 14:40 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-19 13:36 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-19 14:28 ` Daniel Bünzli
2008-11-19 14:45 ` Paolo Donadeo
2008-11-21 12:37 ` Michaël Le Barbier
2008-11-18 11:17 ` David Teller
2008-11-18 12:22 ` Richard Jones
2008-11-18 12:49 ` David Teller
2008-11-18 15:20 ` Richard Jones
2008-11-18 18:17 ` Jon Harrop
2008-11-18 17:51 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2008-11-18 22:43 ` Jon Harrop
2008-11-18 18:59 ` Richard Jones
2008-11-18 20:17 ` Jon Harrop
2008-11-18 19:22 ` Richard Jones
2008-11-18 19:50 ` Daniel Bünzli
2008-11-18 21:50 ` Richard Jones
2008-11-19 13:48 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-19 19:02 ` Stéphane Glondu
2008-11-18 22:07 ` Alain Frisch
2008-11-18 23:49 ` Jon Harrop
2008-11-18 23:13 ` Alain Frisch
2008-11-19 13:28 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-18 23:30 ` Jon Harrop
2008-11-19 6:29 ` David Teller
2008-11-19 8:36 ` Jon Harrop
2008-11-19 9:46 ` Paolo Donadeo
2008-11-19 20:11 ` Maxence Guesdon
2008-11-20 9:28 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2008-11-20 10:33 ` Richard Jones
2008-11-20 10:49 ` open Module (not?) considered harmful Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-20 11:29 ` [Caml-list] " David Allsopp
2008-11-20 11:48 ` Richard Jones
2008-11-20 17:56 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-20 13:01 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2008-11-20 13:41 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2008-11-20 16:44 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-21 2:56 ` Stability of exceptions Eliot Handelman
2008-11-21 7:39 ` [Caml-list] " Daniel Bünzli
2008-11-21 9:52 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2008-11-20 14:46 ` [Caml-list] open Module (not?) considered harmful Ashish Agarwal
2008-11-20 17:54 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-20 11:31 ` Daniel Bünzli
2008-11-23 10:36 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-20 11:41 ` Richard Jones
2008-11-23 10:38 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-11-23 11:01 ` Richard Jones
2008-11-20 12:58 ` [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included Nicolas Pouillard
2008-11-20 21:12 ` David Teller
2008-11-20 23:18 ` Daniel Bünzli
2008-11-21 9:34 ` David Teller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421532A1-E2CA-404F-8387-E11DA9B3DE79@erratique.ch \
--to=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).