From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C49FBC84 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:17:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2DGHebv010457 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:17:40 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA04904 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:17:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from redirect4.airmail.net (99.7b.d1c4.cidr.airmail.net [209.196.123.153]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2DGHcRv010451 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:17:39 +0100 Received: from host-216-39-197-201.mylinuxisp.com ([216.39.197.201] helo=welgehausen.net) by redirect4.airmail.net with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1DAVrK-0004UF-43 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:22:30 -0600 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:17:28 -0600 From: Kurt Welgehausen To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] how to "disable" GC? Message-ID: <42346798.mailQ91UPBRN@kwel.net> References: <20050312.225725.125114910.eijiro_sumii@anet.ne.jp> <20050313.095234.125114068.eijiro_sumii@anet.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20050313.095234.125114068.eijiro_sumii@anet.ne.jp> User-Agent: nail 10.4 1/19/03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 423467A4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 423467A2.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocamlopt:01 caml:02 archives:02 inria:05 platforms:08 sparc:08 kurt:10 difference:13 related:15 msg:15 try:18 array:19 boxed:19 regards:19 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: > Are floting-point numbers heap-allocated in ocamlopt on sparc? Yes, I believe FP values are boxed on all platforms. You could try keeping your values in an array, and see if that makes any difference. Also, see and related messages. Regards