From: Robert Roessler <roessler@rftp.com>
To: Caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Regarding the 3.08.3 source tarballs...
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:33:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4241FCE0.4050201@rftp.com> (raw)
I noticed that the [BZIP2] source tarball was slightly smaller than
that for 3.08.2... how often does software get smaller? :)
So I looked over the two trees, and immediately saw that there are
almost 400 *more* files in the newer source tree... but that almost
all of them come from the CVS directories being present in the 3.08.3
source.
Is this intentional? I note that the "Root" files do not appear to
contain the correct data for external anonymous access...
Robert Roessler
roessler@rftp.com
http://www.rftp.com
next reply other threads:[~2005-03-23 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-23 23:33 Robert Roessler [this message]
2005-03-24 10:51 ` [Caml-list] " Damien Doligez
2005-03-25 20:22 ` Robert Roessler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4241FCE0.4050201@rftp.com \
--to=roessler@rftp.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).