From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A70ABC48 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:32:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2NNWiB2016619 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:32:45 +0100 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA17574 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:32:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from smtp802.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp802.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.181]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id j2NNWgMJ016603 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:32:43 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (rftp@pacbell.net@63.194.18.166 with plain) by smtp802.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Mar 2005 23:32:38 -0000 Message-ID: <4241FCE0.4050201@rftp.com> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:33:52 -0800 From: Robert Roessler Organization: Robert's High-performance Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Caml-list Subject: Regarding the 3.08.3 source tarballs... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4241FC9C.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4241FC9A.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; tarballs:01 tarball:01 cvs:01 intentional:01 ...:98 ...:98 data:02 tree:02 slightly:02 external:02 root:03 correct:08 newer:09 robert:11 robert:11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: I noticed that the [BZIP2] source tarball was slightly smaller than that for 3.08.2... how often does software get smaller? :) So I looked over the two trees, and immediately saw that there are almost 400 *more* files in the newer source tree... but that almost all of them come from the CVS directories being present in the 3.08.3 source. Is this intentional? I note that the "Root" files do not appear to contain the correct data for external anonymous access... Robert Roessler roessler@rftp.com http://www.rftp.com