From: Daan Leijen <daan@cs.uu.nl>
To: Erik de Castro Lopo <ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com>
Cc: effbiae@ivorykite.com, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: some comments on ocaml{lex,yacc} from a novice's POV
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:29:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <425116FF.9030703@cs.uu.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050404154408.16534457.ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 763 bytes --]
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>>compare with caml solutions? compare with any other solution?
>>
>>
>
>There are parsers for Haskell which would compare very favourably
>with your lisp parser. I haven't used them myself but I've seen
>example code somewhere.
>
>
The Parsec manual contains a few nice examples and pointers to further
literature
on parser combinators if you are interested.
<http://www.cs.uu.nl/~daan/parsec.html>
Everything is statically checked of course ;-)
All the best,
-- Daan Leijen.
>
>
>>i'm told there are good scheme compilers.
>>
>>
>
>Since scheme is a dynamically typed language, scheme compilers are
>unlikely to ever produce code as fast as a compiler for a statically
>typed langugae like ocaml.
>
>Erik
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1508 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-04 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-01 11:32 bug in "developing applications with objective caml" (english translation) Jack Andrews
2005-04-01 20:03 ` [Caml-list] " Ken Rose
2005-04-02 5:10 ` some comments on ocaml{lex,yacc} from a novice's POV Jack Andrews
2005-04-02 7:02 ` [Caml-list] " Erik de Castro Lopo
2005-04-02 7:38 ` Jacques Garrigue
2005-04-03 16:18 ` Parser combinators [was: some comments on ocaml{lex,yacc} from a novice's POV] Alex Baretta
2005-04-04 0:40 ` [Caml-list] Parser combinators Jacques Garrigue
2005-04-05 16:06 ` [Caml-list] some comments on ocaml{lex,yacc} from a novice's POV Oliver Bandel
[not found] ` <50130.202.164.198.46.1112418605.squirrel@www.ivorykite.com>
2005-04-04 3:42 ` Jack Andrews
2005-04-04 5:44 ` [Caml-list] " Erik de Castro Lopo
2005-04-04 9:51 ` Jon Harrop
2005-04-05 12:00 ` Geoff Wozniak
2005-04-05 13:49 ` Jon Harrop
2005-04-05 14:26 ` Richard Jones
2005-04-05 16:13 ` Oliver Bandel
2005-04-06 4:52 ` Geoff Wozniak
2005-04-06 5:12 ` Kenneth Knowles
2005-04-06 6:15 ` some comments on ocaml{lex,yacc} from anovice's POV Jack Andrews
2005-04-04 10:29 ` Daan Leijen [this message]
2005-04-04 17:39 ` [Caml-list] Re: some comments on ocaml{lex,yacc} from a novice's POV Paul Snively
2005-04-04 18:16 ` skaller
2005-04-04 18:49 ` Paul Snively
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=425116FF.9030703@cs.uu.nl \
--to=daan@cs.uu.nl \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=effbiae@ivorykite.com \
--cc=ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).