From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5C6BC48 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 11:48:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id j3A9mAt4027509 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 11:48:10 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO ?83.114.111.217?) (sejourne?kevin@83.114.111.217 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2005 09:48:09 -0000 Message-ID: <425914C2.1010101@yahoo.fr> Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 11:57:54 +0000 From: sejourne_kevin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] float precision on AMD64 References: <2a1a1a0c0504091814876c24a@mail.gmail.com> <42588430.3060105@rftp.com> In-Reply-To: <42588430.3060105@rftp.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4258F65A.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 doubles:01 unboxed:01 wrote:01 integer:01 floats:01 module:03 float:03 float:03 probably:05 standard:07 ieee:08 point:11 robert:11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: Robert Roessler wrote : > This is probably because "floats" in standard (32-bit) OCaml are already > "doubles" (they use IEEE 64-bit floating point representation). :) So is it possible to have a module of unboxed float with lesser precision? just like integer. Kévin.