From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD92BC48 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:28:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3IGSEWv020822 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:28:14 +0200 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA16524 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:28:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.barettadeit.com (h213-255-109-130.albacom.net [213.255.109.130] (may be forged)) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3IGSDIP020817 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:28:13 +0200 Received: from [10.0.0.10] (alex.barettalocal.com [10.0.0.10]) by mail.barettadeit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED28802C954 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:28:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4263E01D.5090705@barettadeit.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:28:13 +0200 From: Alex Baretta User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CamlGI question References: <810e04dc0f6bb601fb828db8d18def6c@fas.harvard.edu> <426361DB.10704@rftp.com> <4263BAD0.5020901@barettadeit.com> <1113834691.6248.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4263E01E.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4263E01D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; baretta:01 caml-list:01 api:01 baretta:01 connectors:98 wrote:01 alexander:02 alex:03 alex:03 370:96 370:96 long:04 srl:04 expose:06 uses:06 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: Michael Alexander Hamburg wrote: > Given then that my application should be multithreaded, and will be > running on a webserver using Rails (which traditionally uses FastCGI), > which of these libraries do you suggest that I use? Http, Netcgi_afp or > Netcgi_fcgi? Or are they interoperable enough that it doesn't matter? So long as you use Netcgi, it does not matter. The API does not expose the difference between the various connectors. Alex -- ********************************************************************* http://www.barettadeit.com/ Baretta DE&IT A division of Baretta SRL tel. +39 02 370 111 55 fax. +39 02 370 111 54 Our technology: The Application System/Xcaml (AS/Xcaml) The FreerP Project