From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67965BCAE for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 19:15:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j66HFq8J002647 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 19:15:53 +0200 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA30880 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 19:15:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp110.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp110.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.95]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id j66HFpfb002644 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 19:15:51 +0200 Received: (qmail 44161 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2005 17:15:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (rftp@pacbell.net@63.194.18.166 with plain) by smtp110.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jul 2005 17:15:50 -0000 Message-ID: <42CC11E8.8040505@rftp.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 10:16:24 -0700 From: Robert Roessler Organization: Robert's High-performance Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Harrop , Caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] x86 vs AMD64 OCaml compiler performance References: <200507060353.29648.jon@ffconsultancy.com> In-Reply-To: <200507060353.29648.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 42CC11C8.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 42CC11C7.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 compiler:01 byte:01 compilation:01 compilation:01 byte:01 vastly:01 ...:98 1800:98 wrote:01 native:02 native:02 slightly:02 900:96 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: Jon Harrop wrote: > I just timed recompilation of my latest project to both byte code and native > code on both 900MHz Athlon t-bird and 800MHz Athlon64. To my suprise, > compilation to native code takes roughly the same amount of time on both > computers but compilation to byte code is slightly faster (1m18 vs 1m40) on > x86 but vastly faster (21s vs 1m50) on AMD64. Ummm... do you mean "1800MHz" or "1.8GHz" for the Athlon64? :) Robert Roessler roessler@rftp.com http://www.rftp.com