From: Robert Roessler <roessler@rftp.com>
To: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Some Clarifications
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:29:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42E826FA.10102@rftp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050727140128.GA8027@furbychan.cocan.org>
Richard Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:55:32AM -0700, Robert Roessler wrote:
>
>>An object certainly seems a natural and concise way to represent a
>>"state-holder-with-structured-access" - and I have done just that in a
>>small OCaml project... but that could be the Smalltalk and C++ in my
>>background talking. :)
>
>
> Modules actually work better for this.
In a non-trolling and non-flaming way (of course), I would be
interested in examples illustrating your assertion - simple or
complex, real or synthetic - I am usually ready to learn. :)
Robert Roessler
roessler@rftp.com
http://www.rftp.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-28 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-27 9:38 Don Syme
2005-07-27 10:58 ` Jon Harrop
2005-07-27 11:55 ` Robert Roessler
2005-07-27 14:01 ` Richard Jones
2005-07-28 0:29 ` Robert Roessler [this message]
2005-07-27 18:42 ` skaller
2005-07-27 13:36 ` David Thomas
2005-07-27 13:53 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-07-27 16:23 ` james woodyatt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-27 14:32 David Thomas
2005-07-14 18:00 (Mostly) Functional Design? Kyle Consalus
2005-07-18 7:59 ` [Caml-list] " Robert Morelli
2005-07-19 20:14 ` Some Clarifications Robert Morelli
2005-07-20 6:18 ` [Caml-list] " Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-07-24 0:04 ` Robert Morelli
2005-07-24 2:30 ` Paul Snively
2005-07-24 7:37 ` Alex Baretta
2005-07-24 8:08 ` Robert Morelli
2005-07-24 12:23 ` David Teller
2005-07-24 18:29 ` skaller
2005-07-24 18:51 ` Paul Snively
2005-07-24 12:42 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2005-07-25 7:23 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-07-20 7:34 ` David MENTRE
2005-07-27 15:37 ` Robert Morelli
2005-07-27 20:33 ` skaller
2005-07-27 23:48 ` Paul Snively
2005-07-20 16:28 ` Damien Doligez
2005-07-24 14:51 ` Robert Morelli
2005-07-24 16:11 ` David MENTRE
2005-07-25 12:21 ` Damien Doligez
2005-07-25 15:47 ` Richard Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42E826FA.10102@rftp.com \
--to=roessler@rftp.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=rich@annexia.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).