From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982CDBB9C for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:28:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j8D9SfJX010581 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:28:41 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA14070 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:28:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from alex.barettalocal.com (h213-255-109-130.albacom.net [213.255.109.130] (may be forged)) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j8D9SeIn002782 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:28:40 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alex.barettalocal.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB902BAA9E for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:28:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <43269BC6.4070307@barettadeit.com> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:28:38 +0200 From: Alex Baretta User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ocaml Subject: Ocaml on AXIS? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 43269BC9.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43269BC8.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; baretta:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 bytecode:01 ocamlopt:01 baretta:01 supported:01 guess:02 guess:02 alex:03 alex:03 370:96 370:96 srl:04 interpreter:06 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 I am interested in the AXIS ETRAX architecture for my company's embedded applications. Of course, the fundamental requirement is that Ocaml be supported (well). I would guess that the bytecode interpreter runs with no significant difference on ETRAX than on i386. I would also guess that Ocamlopt is not available. Am I correct? Alex -- ********************************************************************* http://www.barettadeit.com/ Baretta DE&IT A division of Baretta SRL tel. +39 02 370 111 55 fax. +39 02 370 111 54 Our technology: The Application System/Xcaml (AS/Xcaml) The FreerP Project