From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C79EBB81 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:22:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j99BM66K029073 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:22:06 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA01835 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:22:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.32]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id j99BM5Ri018863 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:22:05 +0200 Received: (qmail 34729 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2005 11:22:05 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=TeXLLuBUz2g24W759ATsignWxk94S2IwU7MajLbpMdqS0YVb9Cx8UGEWNxwKKQmK6GS5sXS0DwJeJ3+TnI7gwGbOQQNu2+WDk5aytcDoJfmURzEcJEe0lqTaRHwC3ja9i1suagOLIeUZe3Ymq9T4UgOiHmxZf0Gfg6Zin0uUq5k= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?84.102.56.33?) (sejourne?kevin@84.102.56.33 with plain) by smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2005 11:22:04 -0000 Message-ID: <4348FE82.7090605@yahoo.fr> Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 13:26:58 +0200 From: sejourne_kevin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ray tracer language comparison References: <200510040018.24932.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <1128853151.26806.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1128853151.26806.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4348FD5E.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4348FD5D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 gerd:01 stolpmann:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 ...:98 telechargez:98 wrote:01 caml:02 caml:02 objective:02 objective:02 unreadable:02 guess:02 benchmark:02 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Gerd Stolpmann a écrit : > Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2005, 10:53 -0400 schrieb Vincenzo Ciancia: > >>Thomas Fischbacher wrote: >> >> >>>As you may have seen from my initial reply to that posting, I originally >>>was quite sceptical. However, I had a somewhat lengthy PM conversation >>>with Dr. Jon Harrop where he kindly and patiently explained to me his >>>methodology and findings, and eventually, this inspired me to contribute >>>another benchmark (which I did of my own) to this comparison. >> >>What is the difference, that you mention in your webpage, between "OCaml" >>and "Objective Caml"? It's not clear to me what your benchmark is about at >>all :) > > > I guess it's a joke. OCaml = the speed-optimized version; Objective Caml > = the version optimized for readability (which I don't agree with). Without colors, it is the same for the two programs... unreadable at all. ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com