From: Matt Gushee <matt@gushee.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Ocamllex question
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:02:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <435BD045.1000305@gushee.net> (raw)
Hello, people--
In a lexer definition with two or more entry points, is there a way to
emit a lexeme and pass control to another entrypoint in one action?
The specific problem I am trying to deal with is a configuration file
format that includes comments denoted with an initial '#' character. I
would like to support the typical usage of '#', where a comment may
begin either at the beginning of the line, or after a declaration that I
want to capture, and in either case it extends to the end of the line.
So in general, anything after '#' up to the end of a line should be
ignored, which I think requires a separate 'comment' entrypoint. At the
end of the line, control returns to the main entry point. So my first
cut looks like this:
rule dict = parse
[' '] { dict lexbuf }
| '#' { comment lexbuf }
| word { WORD (Lexing.lexeme lexbuf) }
| ':' { COLON }
| '{' { DS }
| '}' { DE }
| ',' | '\n' { SEP }
| eof { EOF }
and comment = parse
[ ^ '\n' ] { comment lexbuf }
| '\n' { dict lexbuf }
So far so good. BUT, for the sake of simplicity (for users, not for me
;-)), my syntax has line endings as separators, and in order to support
comments following non-comments on the same line, a line ending after a
comment should be interpreted as a separator. So what I want to do is
something like:
and comment = parse
[ ^ '\n' ] { comment lexbuf }
| '\n' { SEP; dict lexbuf }
But that doesn't work, of course. Maybe the solution is to push SEP back
onto the head of the buffer, but I don't see a way to do that.
Or would it be better to simply tag the comment text with, say, a
COMMENT symbol and pass it through to the parser?
--
Matt Gushee
Englewood, CO, USA
next reply other threads:[~2005-10-23 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-23 18:02 Matt Gushee [this message]
2005-10-23 20:58 ` [Caml-list] " Michael Wohlwend
2005-10-23 21:12 ` Another problem (was Re: [Caml-list] Ocamllex question) Matt Gushee
2005-10-23 21:37 ` Michael Wohlwend
2005-10-24 19:50 ` Matt Gushee
2005-10-24 20:18 ` Michael Wohlwend
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-10 22:44 ocamllex question Robert Muller
2005-09-21 18:34 skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=435BD045.1000305@gushee.net \
--to=matt@gushee.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).