From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9F5BB9A for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:53:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j9SIrJ6i001946 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:53:20 +0200 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA23577 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:53:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mz2.forethought.net (mzpi4.forethought.net [216.241.36.13]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j9SIrHOr019498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:53:18 +0200 Received: from [216.241.35.41] (helo=[10.0.0.2]) by mz2.forethought.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EVZLn-0004vX-NJ for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:53:15 -0600 Message-ID: <436273A1.9030104@gushee.net> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:53:21 -0600 From: Matt Gushee User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Strange output from Camlp4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4362739F.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4362739D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; syntax:01 val:01 mutable:01 cmo:01 impl:01 expr:01 data:02 data:02 btw:02 binding:02 revised:02 objects:02 output:02 string:03 string:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 In the process of trying to learn the revised syntax for objects, I have encountered a strange message from Camlp4. I have a file, ox.ml, whose contents look like this: let conf = object val mutable data:(string * string) list = [] method get k = List.assoc k data end BTW, that is deliberately a let binding rather than a class definition. Is that not supposed to work? Anyway, as suggested by the Camlp4 manual, I run camlp4o pr_r.cmo ox.ml With the result: value conf =; ??? -- Matt Gushee Englewood, CO, USA