From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF85D45F for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 21:46:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA3KkmH1014824 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 21:46:48 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA19366 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 21:46:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from mz2.forethought.net (mzpi4.forethought.net [216.241.36.13]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA3KkjCV022147 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 21:46:46 +0100 Received: from [216.241.35.41] (helo=[10.0.0.2]) by mz2.forethought.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EXlyr-0005vw-Vf for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 13:46:42 -0700 Message-ID: <436A773A.5050108@gushee.net> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 13:46:50 -0700 From: Matt Gushee User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wikipedia References: <200511031726.59561.jon@ffconsultancy.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 436A7738.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 436A7735.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 on-topic:01 wrote:01 maintainers:01 probably:05 fundamental:06 similar:10 think:11 think:11 point:11 changes:12 qualify:87 but:12 but:12 isn't:13 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Kip Macy wrote: > This isn't on-topic for the list, and may even qualify as a troll, but I > think your experiences point to another fundamental deficiency of the > wikipedia. Why do you think that others will have more success in their > updates than you have? Probably no single individual will have more success, but if several people submit changes along similar lines, I would think the maintainers will at least pay attention. -- Matt Gushee Englewood, CO, USA