caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Gushee <matt@gushee.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Ant:  [Caml-list] The "Objective" part of Objective Caml
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:42:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4370C761.9010800@gushee.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511080859590.20621@localhost.localdomain>

Brian Hurt wrote:

>> Don't you have immediate objects [1] to do singletons ?
> 
> 
> No- because immediate objects still allocate a new object every time
> they are evaluated.  I suppose you could do:
> 
> let factory =
>     let myobject = new myclass in
>     fun () -> myobject
> ;;
> 
> and do a factory method, but there is no way (that I know of) to prevent
> someone else from doing:
>     let myotherobject = new myclass
> and allocating a different object of the same class.

Just for amusement, here are two ways:

[1]

   let factory =
     let instance_exists = ref false in
     let mkobj () =
       object
         initializer
           if !instance_exists then failwith "Sorry."
           else instance_exists := true
         ...
       end in
     mkobj

[2]

  foo.mli:
  --------

  class type t_myclass =
    object
      ....
    end

  val factory : unit -> t_myclass

  foo.ml:
  -------

  class type t_myclass =
    object
      ....
    end

  class myclass =
    object
      ....
    end

  let instance : t_myclass option ref = ref None

  let factory () =
    match !instance with
    | Some i -> i
    | None -> let i = new myclass in instance := Some i; i


> No, the proper way to do singletons in Ocaml is with modules, not objects.

But Brian is right, I'm sure.

-- 
Matt Gushee
Englewood, CO, USA


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-08 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-04 22:45 Florian Weimer
2005-11-07 21:41 ` Ant: [Caml-list] " Martin Chabr
2005-11-07 21:55   ` Florian Weimer
2005-11-08  1:47     ` skaller
2005-11-08  2:15       ` Brian Hurt
2005-11-08  7:15         ` Daniel Bünzli
2005-11-08 15:02           ` Brian Hurt
2005-11-08 15:39             ` Alexander Fuchs
2005-11-08 15:42             ` Matt Gushee [this message]
2005-11-08 15:56               ` Michael Wohlwend
2005-11-08 18:16         ` brogoff
2005-11-08 22:04           ` Brian Hurt
2005-11-08 23:40             ` brogoff
2005-11-09  9:00             ` skaller
2005-11-11 15:28       ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4370C761.9010800@gushee.net \
    --to=matt@gushee.net \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).