From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191EFBB81 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:20:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jACCKaFv018515 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:20:36 +0100 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA17040 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:20:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from irma.motion-twin.com (irma.motiontwin.com [213.186.50.39]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jACCKZMD007938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:20:35 +0100 Received: from [61.213.94.147] (helo=[192.168.5.25] ident=proxyuser) by irma.motion-twin.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.54) id 1EauMy-0004TS-Dw; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:20:32 +0100 Message-ID: <4375DDFC.9060802@motion-twin.com> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:20:12 +0900 From: Nicolas Cannasse User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: skaller Cc: Florent , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] strange behavior with record type definition References: <43752259.80800@aist.enst.fr> <4375CAC8.5030803@aist.enst.fr> <1131797575.18524.0.camel@rosella> In-Reply-To: <1131797575.18524.0.camel@rosella> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4375DE14.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4375DE13.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; cannasse:01 ncannasse:01 motion-twin:01 caml-list:01 ...:98 expression:01 nicolas:02 nicolas:02 construct:02 labels:02 types:02 strange:07 definition:07 label:07 differents:10 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 >>Mmhh, why do we have to use differents label names in distinct record >>types ? > > > So that the type of an expression: > > { x = 1; y = 2 } > > can be determined. It could still be determined using all the labels together instead of the first one only, but that will not go well with the { r with ... } construct. Nicolas