From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6B3BB9C for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 02:03:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAI13J2G004198 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 02:03:19 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA32725 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 02:03:19 +0100 (MET) Received: from mz3.forethought.net (mzpi5.forethought.net [216.241.36.14]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAI13H9o004195 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 02:03:18 +0100 Received: from [216.241.35.41] (helo=[10.0.0.2]) by mz3.forethought.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Ecueq-0006lR-7n; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:03:16 -0700 Message-ID: <437D2886.8090701@gushee.net> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:04:06 -0700 From: Matt Gushee User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Cc: ocaml-gui@googlegroups.com Subject: LablTk Deuglification Tutorial Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 437D2857.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 437D2855.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; labltk:01 cons:03 toolkit:03 ugly:03 gui:04 tutorial:04 discussion:07 discussion:07 some:12 but:12 there:17 ...:82 hello:17 could:20 list:21 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Hello, all-- Some time ago on this list, there was a discussion of the pros and cons of the Tk GUI toolkit. In the course of that discussion I claimed that Tk could be made significantly less ugly ... someone asked how, but I never answered--sorry! At any rate, here, finally, is the answer: http://matt.gushee.net/rg/items/4 Enjoy! -- Matt Gushee Englewood, CO, USA