From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CB3BBC4 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:37:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k0KGbPSl009198 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:37:25 +0100 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA31649 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:37:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.barettadeit.com (h213-255-109-130.albacom.net [213.255.109.130] (may be forged)) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k0KGbOux003638 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:37:25 +0100 Received: from [10.0.0.10] (alex.barettalocal.com [10.0.0.10]) by mail.barettadeit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848EF8A4D49 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:37:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43D111C4.3080204@barettadeit.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:37:24 +0100 From: Alessandro Baretta User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Associativity of new operators References: <43D10AA1.8050102@barettadeit.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43D111C5.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 43D111C4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; baretta:01 baretta:01 barettadeit:01 caml-list:01 signoles:01 ocaml:01 trivial:01 wrote:01 caml:02 alessandro:03 alex:03 docs:05 probably:05 inria:05 manual:06 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Julien Signoles wrote: > > Section 6.7 of the manual, there is a table giving the associativity of > the operators (and other constructions): > > http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual015.html > > > Hope this helps, > Julien Ah, I see. Although I Googled for "ocaml associativity" I missed that page, or probably I did not notic the table. Thanks to everyone who answered. Also, please excuse me for posting such a trivial question. Alex