From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C353BBA7 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 06:08:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr (smtp2-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.28]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k1958jhF029122 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 06:08:45 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (rke75-3-82-229-183-156.fbx.proxad.net [82.229.183.156]) by smtp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63AA521D0; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 06:08:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43EACE5C.4010804@inria.fr> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 06:08:44 +0100 From: Alain Frisch User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alessandro Baretta Cc: OCaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Namespace clash References: <43E9F1EE.1070502@barettadeit.com> In-Reply-To: <43E9F1EE.1070502@barettadeit.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 43EACE5D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; frisch:01 frisch:01 caml-list:01 baretta:01 ocaml:01 lacks:01 compiler:01 mli:01 compiler:01 -pp:01 wrote:01 directive:02 clash:02 alain:03 alain:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Alessandro Baretta wrote: > Probably, all that ocaml lacks to properly handle namespacing is a -open > directive, telling the compiler to imply a "open Xxxx" at the beginning > of all .ml and .mli files on the command line. Given this compiler flag, > the build system could take care of everything. Couldn't you use the -pp option to achieve the same behavior? -- Alain