From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358F9BBAF for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:17:37 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah8EAMfz7EzCpx5ei2dsb2JhbACUUI43FQEBAQoLChgivyOFRwSNbw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,249,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="80147170" Received: from sucre.univ-orleans.fr ([194.167.30.94]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2010 20:17:36 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sucre.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA35794466; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:17:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from sucre.univ-orleans.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sucre.univ-orleans.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id czo19GP8qX8g; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:17:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (smtps.univ-orleans.fr [194.167.30.152]) by sucre.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46D994465; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:17:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (dau94-10-88-189-211-192.fbx.proxad.net [88.189.211.192]) by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB5536E60; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:17:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: David Rajchenbach-Teller In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:17:35 +0100 Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <43F4B91B-06EE-4811-95CC-689AB6093A59@univ-orleans.fr> References: <361805.43543.qm@web120503.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> To: Isaac Gouy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 univ-orleans:01 beginner's:01 ocaml:01 bug:01 poverty:98 beginners:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 writes:01 bin:01 arbitrary:02 purely:02 caml:02 Hey, guys. Time to stop this, please. Thanks, David On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote: > Ed Keith yahoo.com> writes: >=20 >>>> I am not asking WHAT the rules are but a JUSTIFICATION >>> for them (which you >>>> have been incapable of providing so far). >>>=20 >>> I feel no need to provide a JUSTIFICATION to you for >>> anything. >>>=20 >>=20 >> Am I to interpret this to mean that the rules are purely arbitrary = and > capricious with no though behind them?=20 >=20 > Tendentious. >=20 > A great deal of thought has been given to all aspects of the = benchmarks game. >=20 >> I hope I am misinterpreting this statement, but can think of no other > interpretation >=20 > Poverty of imagination. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs