From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF15BBBB for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:24:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [128.93.11.101] (buzet.inria.fr [128.93.11.101]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k1SGOmrn028227 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:24:48 +0100 Message-ID: <44047948.9070808@inria.fr> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:24:40 +0100 From: Alain Frisch User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Wohlwend Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] xml tree -- variant type tree References: <17412.27387.963123.675231@ithif59.inf.tu-dresden.de> <20060228154708.GA9583@furbychan.cocan.org> <200602281657.39518.micha-1@fantasymail.de> In-Reply-To: <200602281657.39518.micha-1@fantasymail.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 44047950.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; frisch:01 frisch:01 caml-list:01 cduce:01 cduce:01 cheers:01 wrote:01 variant:02 tree:02 tree:02 alain:03 alain:03 tutorial:04 long:05 long:05 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Michael Wohlwend wrote: > CDuce is a miracle for me. I tried it for hours and never had the feeling I > unstood how it worked or why some code worked and some other not :-) At some > point I thought it would be easier to code in brainf*ck than in cduce, but > that might not be right :-) I'm pretty sure that a lot more useful code has been written in brainf*ck than in CDuce, so you're probably right. Have the hours you spent been long enough to look at the resources to learn the language (manual, tutorial, demos, other people's code)? They might not be perfect, but they certainly were ok for some people. Also, I would have recommended to subscribe to the CDuce mailing list, since questions asked there usually get a quick answer. Anyway, it would be helpful if you could post some feedback, be it negative, as long as it contains concrete information. Cheers, Alain