From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BE3BB81 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 20:07:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.63]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k28J7HB7014716 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 20:07:18 +0100 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=YJGz7BA71vFk0SQT7dISDlPg6wcOl1uy4V1E+DAzevPzSZHXM6wcilbGZb/frL6M; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [70.59.207.72] (helo=[192.168.1.101]) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1FH40D-0000Jf-4H for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:07:17 -0500 Message-ID: <440F2B63.6000007@earthlink.net> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:07:15 -0700 From: "Matthew O'Connor" Reply-To: mboconnor@acm.org User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] recursive or loop References: <200603061715.k26HF32w015203@nez-perce.inria.fr> <200603061925.35321.micha-1@fantasymail.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: c5e7d5cff6dcd352d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc4a05944369b027b5959ae7b8bbc054f4350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 70.59.207.72 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 440F2B65.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; recursive:01 stack:01 2006:98 heap:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 cps:02 cps:02 michael:08 basically:09 equivalent:09 explain:11 doesn't:11 doesn't:11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Thomas Fischbacher wrote: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Michael Wohlwend wrote: > >> On Monday 06 March 2006 18:25, Jonathan Harrop wrote: >>> Write in CPS? >> no experience with that. Doesn't it need support of the language? > > No it does not. But never mind. It would not help either. > Doesn't CPS enable you to basically keep the entire call stack (or equivalent) in the heap? Can you explain why it wouldn't help? Thanks. Matt