From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFCFBBBB for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 03:54:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp107.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp107.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.169.227]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id k2U1sjr4032379 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 03:54:52 +0200 Received: (qmail 52925 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2006 01:54:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.4?) (jd?hsu@68.122.224.241 with plain) by smtp107.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2006 01:54:44 -0000 Message-ID: <442B3A67.8040804@email.sjsu.edu> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:54:47 -0800 From: jean-david hsu User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: command line invocation performances Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 442B3A65.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; invocation:01 ocaml:01 cmo:01 telechargez:98 sys:03 executable:03 drawback:04 compiled:04 hsu:05 appeler:06 edu:08 messenger:90 messenger:90 using:15 command:83 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Hi, Is there significant performance drawback when using Sys.command to call an executable compiled from ocaml code compared to calling the same code from a .cmo ? JD ___________________________________________________________________________ Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! Découvez les tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international. Téléchargez sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com