From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D89CBB83 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:38:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k3JIcSA1019416 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:38:28 +0200 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA07398 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:38:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (smtp6-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.36]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k3JIcRk4027156 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:38:27 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (ron59-1-82-225-126-56.fbx.proxad.net [82.225.126.56]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2066422493; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:38:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4446919B.9090405@free.fr> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:38:03 +0200 From: Marc Lasson User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keiko Nakata Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Bug in ocamlc or in ocamlrun. References: <4445734B.6030004@free.fr> <20060419.174523.68533574.keiko@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20060419.174523.68533574.keiko@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 444683A4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 444683A3.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bug:01 ocamlc:01 ocamlrun:01 ocaml:01 bug:01 ocaml-:01 recursive:01 ocaml:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 distrib:01 modules:01 caml:02 hum:05 inria:06 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Keiko Nakata wrote: >Strangely, OCaml version 3.08.0 can handle this code. >So, the developer team must know the reason. >Did you write a bug report ? > > According to , there was a change about recursive modules. They may have add a bug. > Did you write a bug report ? > Hum. Should I ? I am not expert at all, i have never written any bug report. I don't know many things about ocaml sources. -- Marc Lasson.