caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
To: David MENTRE <dmentre@linux-france.org>
Cc: Erik de Castro Lopo <ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] What's "advantage of gcc-specific features"?
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:43:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <444BAEC5.80600@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d5f8sci8.fsf@linux-france.org>

>>>The OCaml maintainers do not have a 64 bit SPARC system to test
>>>on and can not take over my port.
>
> I'm quite surprised. INRIA had tons of SPARC systems in the past (this
> is at least true at INRIA Rennes). Was it impossible for the OCaml team
> to get some of these systems when they were changed for PCs?

My research group and other groups in the vicinity stopped buying Sun
workstations circa 1994, as much better alternatives have been
available since then.  SPARCstations remained popular for a while with
our network administrators, as small servers, but I don't think I
could dumpster-dive and get any SPARCstation built in the 21st century.

Besides, resurrecting old hardware is time-consuming and generally
disappointing.  ("Oh my God, look at the dust cloud it coughed!  Hmmm,
that runs really slow...  The OS is five major versions behind!  Where
is my favorite open source software?  Ah, there's no CDROM in this
beast.  Where did I put my vintage external SCSI 1x CDROM?  (One
hour later.)  Damn, the internal disk is too small."  etc.)

>>People who own 64 bit SPARC systems and want to see the SPARC
>>port continued should contact SUN and suggest that SUN supply
>>a machine for the Ocaml developers.

Good idea.  It would look good in the machine room :-)

- Xavier Leroy


      reply	other threads:[~2006-04-23 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-22  1:37 Yu-Hui Liu
2006-04-22  1:46 ` [Caml-list] " Jonathan Roewen
2006-04-22  4:09   ` Michael Benfield
2006-04-22  9:47 ` David MENTRE
2006-04-22 16:14   ` John Carr
2006-04-22 23:15     ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2006-04-23 12:27       ` David MENTRE
2006-04-23 16:43         ` Xavier Leroy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=444BAEC5.80600@inria.fr \
    --to=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=dmentre@linux-france.org \
    --cc=ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).