caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
To: Jacques Carette <carette@mcmaster.ca>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] compiler bug?
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 19:46:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <446CB2EE.1080102@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <446CB021.6000009@mcmaster.ca>

>> Well, there is the paper by George and Appel where they use an ILP
>> solver (integer linear programming) to produce optimal spills, but
>> that's kind of expensive...
>
> It is my impression that users of compilers are "ready" for the
> following situation:
> 1) an optimizing compiler (like ocamlopt!) that produces good code
> efficiently
> 2) a super-optimizing compiler that produces fantastic code, at whatever
> cost.

Clearly, you're not the guy who would have to support both compilers :-)
More seriously, I agree that optional "super-optimization" passes
could be useful in some cases.

Actually, George and Appel found that compilation times with their
approach were almost reasonable (e.g. a few minutes instead of a few
seconds for a standard compiler), but they had to use a commercial ILP
solver.  If only there were *really good* ILP and SAT solvers under free
licenses...

- Xavier Leroy


  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-18 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-17 23:14 Dan Koppel
2006-05-17 23:33 ` [Caml-list] " John Carr
2006-05-18 17:15 ` Xavier Leroy
2006-05-18 17:34   ` Jacques Carette
2006-05-18 17:46     ` Xavier Leroy [this message]
2006-05-18 19:31       ` Jacques Carette
2006-05-18 20:07         ` David Brown
2006-05-18 20:15           ` Jacques Carette
2006-05-18 20:20           ` Alain Frisch
2006-05-18 18:19     ` skaller
2006-05-18 18:53       ` Jacques Carette
2006-05-19  1:47         ` skaller
2006-05-19  2:17           ` Brian Hurt
2006-05-19  3:11             ` skaller
2006-05-19 16:48           ` Jacques Carette
2006-05-19 19:10             ` skaller
2012-08-06 10:04 [Caml-list] Compiler bug? Dmitry Bely
2012-08-06 10:11 ` Alain Frisch
2012-08-06 10:20   ` Dmitry Bely
2012-08-06 10:34     ` Alain Frisch
2012-08-06 11:03       ` Dmitry Bely
2012-08-06 11:32         ` Alain Frisch
2012-08-06 12:16           ` Dmitry Bely
2012-08-07  1:35           ` Cedric Cellier
2012-08-08 16:03           ` Dmitry Bely
2012-08-08 18:03             ` Alain Frisch
2012-08-08 18:22               ` Jesper Louis Andersen
2012-08-08 18:40                 ` Dmitry Bely
2012-08-08 19:29                   ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2012-08-08 23:34                 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2012-08-09  0:53                 ` Francois Berenger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=446CB2EE.1080102@inria.fr \
    --to=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    --cc=carette@mcmaster.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).