From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF98BC58 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 13:51:11 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoIEAIrV7EtbeR7Se2dsb2JhbACReYwZAQEWIgMfvD6FEAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,229,1272837600"; d="scan'208";a="51167682" Received: from 27.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.30.210]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with SMTP; 14 May 2010 13:51:11 +0200 Received: (qmail 11291 invoked by uid 503); 14 May 2010 11:55:17 -0000 Received: from b7.ovh.net (HELO mail193.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.57) by 27.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 May 2010 11:55:17 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 May 2010 11:51:10 -0000 Received: from 81-64-225-224.rev.numericable.fr (HELO ?192.168.0.10?) (forum%x9c.fr@81.64.225.224) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 May 2010 11:51:09 -0000 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: "forum@x9c.fr" In-Reply-To: <012601caf351$e9a362e0$bcea28a0$@com> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 13:51:09 +0200 Cc: forum@x9c.fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <44A730DD-54EB-4A1C-BD1A-6E9EFB31B5A2@x9c.fr> References: <951508.20587.qm@web58708.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <201005061233.07551.peng.zang@gmail.com> <07b101caf08b$3e5022c0$baf06840$@com> <088201caf1ce$b5060cb0$1f122610$@com> <20100512151137.26894ywcpv71ixvk@imp.ovh.net> <012601caf351$e9a362e0$bcea28a0$@com> To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 4119949235376489440 X-Ovh-Remote: 81.64.225.224 (81-64-225-224.rev.numericable.fr) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-Spam: no; 0.00; bigloo:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 slower:02 xavier:06 xavier:06 ecrit:06 benchmarks:07 quite:08 target:91 jvm:11 jvm:11 though:13 moreover:13 limiting:15 Le 14 mai 2010 =E0 12:40, Jon Harrop a =E9crit : > Xavier Clerc wrote: >> Limiting myself to the JVM... >> Moreover, at least Scala and Bigloo deliver excellent performances. >=20 > I have benchmarks where the JVM is well over 10x slower than .NET. So = I do > not regard any JVM-based language as "high performance". Quite ironically, by scratching the surface, one would discover that = both quoted projects can also target .NET (not tested that though). Regards, Xavier Clerc