From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3555B7EC6E
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:53:08 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApUBADz8sVJKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABZhxq1e4ExDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogiYBAQQjZgsaAiYCAkcQBhuHfASxJJkfF4EpjTY6gm41gRMBA55EF457
X-IPAS-Result: ApUBADz8sVJKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABZhxq1e4ExDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogiYBAQQjZgsaAiYCAkcQBhuHfASxJJkfF4EpjTY6gm41gRMBA55EF457
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,508,1384297200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="49599858"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2013 20:53:07 +0100
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (138-225.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.225.138])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD36207D493
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 19:53:05 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:53:03 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: caml list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <44B82882F02B44D3B3E298CEF670E59B@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CAN6ygOm0W759cfXi0_Mun_XF=My8CFnU2r_G2bRg1oQq0wjgQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4DDEBB7487B641C0834F09D522EA9918@erratique.ch>
 <CAMu2m2KyPwte=NP8wg9=33mnnVywfNKAnEWO_D2KtsqbDWihBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1C9496037B6149EC970D65C3BFA490F7@erratique.ch>
 <CAMu2m2KfPFUUPFmUTnqkTB0-EmETg0eQ+c50AzCk9ZMTie6Bow@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN=ouMTQPL-HFZu5HML5SJh-bOik-UCgbuvSVDfL4S5VnxQkGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMu2m2+jiWUKFFAu0YVF_dUdtt5YbgshXNZmQkX5c1YPJe+6zw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN6ygOm0W759cfXi0_Mun_XF=My8CFnU2r_G2bRg1oQq0wjgQw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] SDL2 bindings, testers and feedback welcome

Le mercredi, 18 d=C3=A9cembre 2013 =C3=A0 19:02, Yotam Barnoy a =C3=A9crit :
> What's wrong with thin_sdl? Sounds much nicer than tsdl to me. Or slim_sd=
l.

Right, I have an idea: let's vote on this !

For the record I'm interested in getting feedback about the design of the b=
inding from a usability point of view (especially the result type vs except=
ion issue), not in pointless discussions about the name of the library. The=
 case has been made for having short toplevel names. The name won't change,=
 deal with it or move on making your own with the fucking good toplevel nam=
e of your choice.

Daniel