From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <Guillaume.Rousse@inria.fr>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EFDBB83
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:36:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (netchaiev.zarb.org [82.224.237.5])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8DFa9Ys010947
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:36:10 +0200
Message-ID: <4508250C.60508@inria.fr>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:34:36 +0200
From: Guillaume Rousse <Guillaume.Rousse@inria.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060906)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: caml versions format
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 45082569.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; guillaume:01 guillaume:01 ocaml:01 dev:01 dev:01 caml:02 breaks:02 string:02 numerical:03 extension:05 inria:06 fancy:08 versions:10 version:12 version:12 

I just get struck by a "3.10+dev8" version string, which breaks my
assumtion that ocaml version are always formated as X.Y.Z, where X, Y
and Z are numerical only.

Do all development version using this specific format, or are they any
other fancy extension ? And how should it get compared to other version
? Should 3.10+dev8 satisfy a minimal 3.10.0 version requirement ?