From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DB5BC6B for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:03:19 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAOduD0fOvjGtoWdsb2JhbACOTQEBAQECBQQGCQgBFw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,268,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="2862379" Received: from web54603.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.49.173]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with SMTP; 12 Oct 2007 22:03:18 +0200 Received: (qmail 56402 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Oct 2007 20:03:17 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=UwgX0swt9vBL8JhJQtToFE4mANGPv7zf/6mFRwM9C+LklU9mhGXZJ008QuhY9RkS6cGaoBwAj3g9LkGkjYY4xdTa57s7r8xRngaDp5Zq7h25+y8iyrEpKleRZMErXmZSeRfJEEsgkdnEpIOMo0ekP9fAr9A39ZnmOHCCGy++PgM=; X-YMail-OSG: F6_t0skVM1n3CbbcA82KD6kl8prtEo9eSza0i9Cof9L.y80iEvHI8rf2xuyGzqAxox3HRiFyJ2ZUMUuVq61Xk1hrsn9ICrOqmaIphfWeanRICxMaAYuBESFlnQJiRHeKjPZoQhvV8ZGx9vQ- Received: from [82.155.112.74] by web54603.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 21:03:17 BST Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 21:03:17 +0100 (BST) From: Dario Teixeira Subject: Re: [Caml-list] A labltk book? To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20071012184726.GC2970@stratocaster.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <456409.56385.qm@web54603.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Spam: no; 0.00; labltk:01 ocaml:01 bindings:01 gtk:01 gtk:01 ocaml:01 caml-list:01 match:02 apps:04 apps:04 imo:04 widgets:05 implement:06 probably:07 written:07 > Probably. Its widgets are also much nicer looking, and apps written > with it don't look jarringly out of place on a modern desktop the way > Tk apps do. (All IMO, of course.) Hi, Still on the subject of toolkits, is there a reason why there aren't any OCaml bindings for Qt? I mean, is it simply because no one ever bothered to implement one, or are there license incompatibility issues? I have used both Qt and Gtk before, and in my opinion, not only does Qt's elegance give it an edge over Gtk, it also feels like it would be a better match to OCaml. Kind regards, Dario Teixeira ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it now. http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/