From: Damien Doligez <Damien.Doligez@inria.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 12:06:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45905683-6297-11D7-B6B4-0003930FCE12@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030328150028.GA9211@iliana>
On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 04:00 PM, Sven Luther wrote:
> Does this not sound as a ugly hack ?
Not to me...
> Would it not be easier to have something akin to -pack, but without its
> technical problems, and have each library pack its module into a
> namespace propper to this library ?
How do you make sure that two different libraries never use the same
namespace ? And if I need to use two versions of the same library
in my program, how do you make sure that two versions of the same
library never use the same namespace ?
> If all library did this by default, at library build time, then there
> would be no need to rename the imports, since those imports would
> already have the modified (that is Library.Module) names ?
You can't avoid renaming of imports unless you have a centralized
allocation of namespaces, and _that_ sounds like an ugly hack to me.
-- Damien
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-30 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-25 19:33 Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2003-03-26 8:25 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-26 8:33 ` Sven Luther
2003-03-26 9:00 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-26 10:50 ` Sven Luther
2003-03-26 11:24 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-26 11:38 ` Sven Luther
2003-03-26 19:08 ` Chris Hecker
2003-03-26 21:08 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-27 17:23 ` David Brown
2003-03-27 19:46 ` Chris Hecker
2003-03-28 5:33 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-28 5:35 ` David Brown
2003-03-28 14:10 ` Damien Doligez
2003-03-28 15:00 ` Sven Luther
2003-03-30 10:06 ` Damien Doligez [this message]
2003-03-30 10:38 ` Sven Luther
2003-04-01 14:14 ` [Caml-list] naming conflicts (was: camlimages vs. labltk) Damien Doligez
2003-04-01 15:05 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2003-04-01 19:51 ` Chris Hecker
2003-04-08 10:33 ` Damien Doligez
2003-03-31 1:21 ` [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk Chris Hecker
2003-03-30 9:26 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-26 18:49 ` Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2003-03-26 10:48 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2003-03-26 10:55 ` Sven Luther
2003-03-26 14:10 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45905683-6297-11D7-B6B4-0003930FCE12@inria.fr \
--to=damien.doligez@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).