From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A7DBC0B for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:17:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.202]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l0VMH0Qm021278 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:17:02 +0100 Received: (qmail 89924 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2007 22:16:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (rftp@pacbell.net@69.230.187.64 with plain) by smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2007 22:16:59 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: fqE1Ua8VM1mndlSD1O_5T1HanmRJuKT0Xg6gF5wurmQyNyj30cv9jfNFpYciYEu1p5TKTGZnzDsv89xeqEm5w_fPi5nfj14JudlOeJYrHJWaLwYJgDM- Message-ID: <45C11557.10704@rftp.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:16:55 -0800 From: Robert Roessler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a2pre) Gecko/20070130 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 SeaMonkey/1.5a MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Caml-list Subject: ocamlc vs ocamlc.opt? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 45C1155C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocamlc:01 ocamlc:01 bytecode:01 findlib:01 ocamlfind:01 lablgtk:01 -thread:01 threads:01 lablgtk:01 gtkinit:01 cmo:01 usr:01 lib:01 ocaml:01 stublibs:01 I just ran into a problem where building a bytecode executable failed with findlib ("ocamlfind ocamlc ...") but the equivalent non-findlib command worked. Then I saw that I could force the same error message in my non-findlib build by just matching findlib's ocamlc.opt, while I had used ocamlc. The command line is: ocamlc -o bait -I +lablgtk2 -I +lablscintilla -thread threads.cma lablgtk.cma gtkInit.cmo scintilla.cma bait.ml which works fine. Changing ocamlc to ocamlc.opt yields: Error on dynamically loaded library: /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dlllablscintilla.so: undefined symbol: caml_names_of_builtin_cprim This is on FC6, with a Yum-installed OCaml 3.09.3 package. Both of the versions of the compiler identify themselves as 3.09.3 with the same standard library location, and both were built on Dec 2 of 2006. So should the versions of ocamlc behave the same excepting performance issues, or ? Robert Roessler roessler@rftp.com http://www.rftp.com