From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB61FBC69 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 00:16:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp108.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp108.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.97]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l16NGH7M032118 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 00:16:19 +0100 Received: (qmail 1160 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2007 23:16:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (rftp@pacbell.net@69.230.187.64 with plain) by smtp108.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2007 23:16:16 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: r5RlN4EVM1l9RTKpOlF9kP7D8r33JmYN75GkvHr_3ExOhyp5h6ef5TkXaJw1VkFLw_Fm_Tcb1yl_.Cpb6ncKwdGCYdgvygH5PiyGIHPne9rErsMHvKLE0HzGi_nhpI4RzoqUU0l57JykGsE- Message-ID: <45C90C36.2030104@rftp.com> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:16:06 -0800 From: Robert Roessler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a2pre) Gecko/20070206 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 SeaMonkey/1.5a MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamlp3l References: <20070207100132.a5a75517.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> In-Reply-To: <20070207100132.a5a75517.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 45C90C41.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 bytecode:01 beginner's:01 ocaml:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 seems:03 erik:04 compiled:04 processors:04 manual:06 inria:06 looks:08 haven't:09 discussed:10 Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Here's something Ocaml related that I haven't seen discussed on > this list (I found it on reddit.com): > > http://ocamlp3l.inria.fr/eng.htm > > I've started reading the user manual and it seems that this only > works for code compiled to bytecode, but it still looks very > interesting. Actually, this was just brought up on the beginner's list yesterday under the perennial subject of "OCaml and multi-core processors". And yes, it does look interesting. Robert Roessler roessler@rftp.com http://www.rftp.com