caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: christian konrad <konrad@in.tum.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Question about try.. with
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:11:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45D8EB3E.7010002@in.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070218.181909.64993949.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>

Thanks for all those hints. For the future I will use the beginners 
list, thank you.
But that seams really strange not to have a strictly defined order of 
evaluation. Isn't that really bad if one would like to do some tail 
recursion to get it compiled without recursion but as a loop?

Thanks and cheers,

Chris

Jacques Garrigue wrote:

>From: christian konrad <konrad@in.tum.de>
>
>  
>
>>I'm doing that:
>>
>>let _ =
>>  try
>>   let infile = open_in !filename in
>>   let rec readIn () =
>>      try
>>         (input_line infile) ^ readIn();
>>      with ee -> "";
>>   in
>>    print_string(readIn () );
>>   "good";
>>  with e -> "";;
>>
>>So why don't I get any output at all? Doesn't "with" erease the raised 
>>Exception?
>>    
>>
>
>Because you assume wrongly that input_line will be called before the
>recursive call to readIn. Nothing in the ocaml specification says so
>(evaluation order is left undefined.) In practice the rightmost call
>is done first, which is the recursive call here, but you shouldn't
>depend on it either.
>By the way, it is a bad idea to catch all exceptions. ee should be
>End_of_file and e should be Sys_error _.
>
>Jacques Garrigue
>
>  
>


  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-19  0:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-17 23:40 christian konrad
2007-02-18  0:37 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2007-02-18  1:01   ` Geoffrey Romer
2007-02-18  9:20     ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-02-18  9:19 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-02-19  0:11   ` christian konrad [this message]
2007-02-19  9:16     ` Andrej Bauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45D8EB3E.7010002@in.tum.de \
    --to=konrad@in.tum.de \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).