caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugo Ferreira <hmf@inescporto.pt>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: camlp4: processing lists
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:27:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45FFB71B.3080002@inescporto.pt> (raw)

Hello,

I have sent this post to the new ocaml-developer list but am resending 
it here in the hopes that someone can help me. I have come across a 
weirdness in camlp4. Maybe someone can explain this puzzle to me.

I have the following extension:

let expand_term_list loc l =
            let nl = <:expr< [] >>                                      in
            let nl = List.fold_right (fun h t ->
                    <:expr< [$h$::$t$] >>
                    ) l nl                              in
            <:expr<
            do {
                   List.iter (fun i -> print_endline i) $nl$
             }
            >>

EXTEND
    Pcaml.expr: [
      [
      "|" ; "[" ; l = LIST0 Pcaml.expr  SEP ";" ; "]" ; "|"->
                   expand_term_list loc l ]  ];
END;;

I compile the source below with the camlp4 extension above:

....

    let t1 =
      List.iter (fun i -> print_endline i) ["1"; "f(X,Y)"; "g(X,Y)"; "4"]
    in
    ()

And the execution gives me:

4

If I generate the original and revised syntax output using the extension
above using for example:

camlp4o -I . pr_o.cmo pa_$(NAME).cmo $(PROG).ml -o $(PROG).ppo
camlp4o -I . pr_r.cmo pa_$(NAME).cmo $(PROG).ml -o $(PROG).ppr

I get for $(PROG).ppo

...
    let t1 =
      List.iter (fun i -> print_endline i) ["1"; "f(X,Y)"; "g(X,Y)"; "4"]
    in
    ()

which is what I expect for the original syntax... but for the revised
syntax $(PROG).ppr I get:

    let t1 =
      do {
        print_string "Not implemented for list ";
        List.iter (fun i -> print_endline i)
          [do { "1"; "f(X,Y)"; "g(X,Y)"; "4" }]
      }
    in
    ()

which ... to say the least is *not* what I expected. I initially I
though I had but one Pcaml.expr and not a list of those.  What seems
to be happening is that the revised syntax is used to generate the
code and this is wrong.

Can anyone tell me what mess I have done?

TIA,
Hugo Ferreira.





             reply	other threads:[~2007-03-20 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-20 10:27 Hugo Ferreira [this message]
2007-03-20 10:54 ` [Caml-list] " Nicolas Pouillard
2007-03-20 11:14   ` Hugo Ferreira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45FFB71B.3080002@inescporto.pt \
    --to=hmf@inescporto.pt \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).