From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DA7BC0A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:30:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [128.93.11.101] (buzet.inria.fr [128.93.11.101]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5DGU4iO018207; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:30:05 +0200 Message-ID: <46701AFB.40403@inria.fr> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:27:39 +0200 From: Alain Frisch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: skaller Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr, felix-impl , Rhythmic Fistman , Emmanuel Onzon Subject: Re: [Caml-list] cywgin stack overflow References: <1181720072.23474.13.camel@rosella.wigram> <1181738340.6135.6.camel@rosella.wigram> <1181743209.6135.13.camel@rosella.wigram> <1181744198.6141.3.camel@rosella.wigram> In-Reply-To: <1181744198.6141.3.camel@rosella.wigram> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 46701B8C.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; frisch:01 frisch:01 stack:01 ocamlopt:01 ocamlopt:01 stack:01 ocaml:01 cygwin:01 mingw:01 segfault:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 msvc:01 alain:01 alain:01 skaller wrote: > ocamlopt.opt: fails without message > ocamlopt: fails with Stack overflow message FYI, OCaml does not implement stack detection under Cygwin in native code (contrary to MSVC and Mingw ports), so the difference of behavior between ocamlopt and ocamlopt.opt is not suprising. (I guess you get the equivalent of a segfault with ocamlopt.opt, but maybe nothing is printed.) -- Alain