From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442F6BC69 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:05:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (smtp6-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.36]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l75G5nOj014127 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:05:50 +0200 Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3CBB8936; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:05:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (che78-2-82-237-71-191.fbx.proxad.net [82.237.71.191]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900D5B8A37; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:05:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46B5F55C.8050201@inria.fr> Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:05:48 +0200 From: Xavier Leroy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: skaller Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Str replacement References: <1186223315.14440.64.camel@rosella.wigram> In-Reply-To: <1186223315.14440.64.camel@rosella.wigram> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 46B5F55D.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; incorrectly:01 rewrote:01 respectable:98 caml-list:01 api:02 module:03 module:03 perhaps:05 xavier:06 xavier:06 underlying:06 interface:06 inria:06 leroy:07 leroy:07 > When is the Str module going to be extended to provide > re-entrant operations?? When someone designs a new interface to Str and gets it approved by a few respectable members of this community. A proof-of-concept implementation wouldn't hurt either, although I'm OK with writing the final implementation. It's the API for which I don't have ideas. > I understand (perhaps incorrectly) that Xavier rewrote the > code for this module, and assume the underlying functionality > is re-entrant? Correct. - Xavier Leroy