From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71C227EDE3
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:38:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  oliver@first.in-berlin.de) identity=pra;
  client-ip=192.109.42.8;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-sender="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  oliver@first.in-berlin.de) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=192.109.42.8;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-sender="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@einhorn.in-berlin.de) identity=helo;
  client-ip=192.109.42.8;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-sender="postmaster@einhorn.in-berlin.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApgBANbuh1DAbSoIe2dsb2JhbABEwXAjAQEWJgQjgh4BAQQBOkQLC0ZXBhOHfgYEuz2LYYYMYQOVc4VkjUY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,640,1344204000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="160246193"
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Oct 2012 15:38:13 +0200
X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de
Received: from [31.227.57.13] (tmo-096-126.customers.d1-online.com [80.187.96.126])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id q9ODc6TY014384
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:38:11 +0200
References: <CAC3Lx=YHyYDqja1qiADBW1O9vXTHN0CCiAqPXrYWi7b0Eg8RFQ@mail.gmail.com> <5087C409.3030203@coherentgraphics.co.uk> <CAC3Lx=ZoMeXadJrbg8Od9ayekNih+Xs_QprnRtp_Ce_-H3bYVQ@mail.gmail.com> <5087E16C.8020503@coherentgraphics.co.uk> <CAC3Lx=ZTp+9BELe2Jf-gCez85_weeoQS1M82t4KNcRGXK-LgNQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC3Lx=ZTp+9BELe2Jf-gCez85_weeoQS1M82t4KNcRGXK-LgNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <46CAD019-77F8-4134-9A96-94A593AB7BC0@first.in-berlin.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A403)
From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:38:03 +0200
To: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Behaviour of an OCaml program: any possible GC
 improvement?



Am 24.10.2012 um 15:19 schrieb David MENTRE <dmentre@linux-france.org>:

> 2012/10/24 John Whitington <john@coherentgraphics.co.uk>:
>> <spontaneous> means gprof can't find the calling function(s).
>=20
> :-(
>=20
>> Are you sure
>> you've used the -p both for compiling all source files and also when lin=
king
>> them into the final executable?
>=20
> I just checked. Yes, I'm using -p for both compilation and linking.

And did you touched all your ml files after activating these switches?
Not, that you recompiled only some of the files... and the others
were compiled before adding -p switch?

Ciao,
   Oliver=