From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16DCBC69 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:28:04 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAFa0+UbZbprC/2dsb2JhbAA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.20,300,1186351200"; d="scan'208";a="1800555" Received: from grisu.bik-gmbh.de ([217.110.154.194]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2007 10:28:04 +0200 Received: from [192.168.125.196] (abel.bik-gmbh.de [192.168.125.196]) by grisu.bik-gmbh.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l8Q8RiTR084279; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:27:44 +0200 (CEST). Message-ID: <46FA1800.90406@bik-gmbh.de> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:27:44 +0200 From: Florian Hars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: skaller Cc: Jon Harrop , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ocaml for Scientific computing References: <2a1a1a0c0709251027v6dc42b38g1138b09f5627dbca@mail.gmail.com> <1190745994.12747.41.camel@rosella.wigram> <200709252138.49050.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <1190754074.6800.8.camel@rosella.wigram> In-Reply-To: <1190754074.6800.8.camel@rosella.wigram> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; hars:01 hars:01 bik-gmbh:01 ocaml:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 bounds:02 slower:02 florian:03 florian:03 guess:04 computing:05 inria:06 schrieb:08 skaller schrieb: > I guess that this is easier. How much speed is gained eliding > bounds checks? It may even make the code slower: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2004/01/679987f7b8b70e4cd9f088ac4e6c8097.en.html Yours, Florian.