From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <arnaud.spiwack@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C53BC69
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:40:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAJHwFkdA6ba8mGdsb2JhbACOTgIBAQcCBhMY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,295,1188770400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="18201817"
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2007 14:40:47 +0200
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e27so124764nfd
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender;
        bh=4r4LlwD5scxehgKwq14p6nqiOmkfKptFt5SHun8Ff48=;
        b=WFaIs/HVGO8s97BskfHm2MDPLfqERywfWnq/KX4vYbHhkxrh69WnlzBsclksML//DZ0C77UFa7D+aK6rTT1UOD/qakMRhowznLchxOymDtQ2J62U2L8CD2MyZQ/NWbnDdL9WDtqJwGmkKgC7J8s+oxlZJ9aEn04bTPhe7FwFJxA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender;
        b=hBk9WAxMuHPCTuhRAnAli+gyODwqSywfTopqyqd37DVJS5UpkrHkUquYZi145gLsOvjpRLfKFY6AbPCJY0FTwYi0lS4s8FNC3f4tCt7hM8rQmwzXzC0B4w6L7iOkWorfGgs6Z8GuhB5moxmww2LqCOeheFW/LWBbPBcdbgsryXM=
Received: by 10.86.28.5 with SMTP id b5mr408234fgb.1192711247298;
        Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.0.5? ( [87.88.165.197])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j2sm1828942mue.2007.10.18.05.40.45
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4717544B.3040000@lix.polytechnique.fr>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:40:43 +0200
From: Arnaud Spiwack <aspiwack@lix.polytechnique.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Help me find this pdf
References: <c1490a380710180252u37034212l9d9ee28a22dca9cc@mail.gmail.com> <200710181325.30668.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
In-Reply-To: <200710181325.30668.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: Arnaud Spiwack <arnaud.spiwack@gmail.com>
X-Spam: no; 0.00; lix:01 haskell:01 fpls:01 arnaud:01 caml-list:01 lazy:02 match:02 pattern:04 laziness:05 i'd:06 evaluation:09 eager:11 might:12 similar:12 i've:12 


> Scala can do something similar by controlling evaluation simply by altering 
> the signature. However, I've reviewed Haskell recently and I think complete 
> laziness is more of a hindrance than a benefit. The only think I'd like to 
> see added to eager FPLs is the ability to pattern match over lazy values, 
> forcing them only when necessary.
>   
Which might simply need to have a support for views, wouldn't it ?