From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809AEBC69 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:36:24 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAKori0fAXQInh2dsb2JhbACQBgEBAQgKKZgz X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,283,1196636400"; d="scan'208";a="6026763" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2008 18:36:24 +0100 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0EHaL1X027294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:36:24 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAIssi0fB/BYfhWdsb2JhbACQBgEBAQgEBg8TB5g0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,283,1196636400"; d="scan'208";a="21216738" Received: from smtp20.orange.fr ([193.252.22.31]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2008 18:36:21 +0100 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2022.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2C6861C0009F for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:36:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.59] (APuteaux-154-1-25-222.w83-199.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.199.80.222]) by mwinf2022.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F13D21C00093; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:36:20 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20080114173620988.F13D21C00093@mwinf2022.orange.fr Message-ID: <478B9D90.8070408@frisch.fr> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:36:16 +0100 From: Alain Frisch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Harrop Cc: caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Hash clash in polymorphic variants References: <200801101709.14110.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <200801140720.02094.ober.14@osu.edu> <200801141714.39963.jon@ffconsultancy.com> In-Reply-To: <200801141714.39963.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 478B9D95.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; frisch:01 frisch:01 hash:01 variants:01 variants:01 afaik:01 clashes:01 polymorphic:01 polymorphic:01 wrote:01 dynamically:01 caml-list:01 alain:01 alain:01 clash:05 Jon Harrop wrote: > Also, what happens if you try to dynamically load two libraries that use > polymorphic variants that clash? AFAIK, this is ok. The problematic clashes can always be detected at type-checking time. -- Alain