* Suggestion
@ 2008-01-30 2:01 Thomas Fischbacher
2008-01-30 13:25 ` [Caml-list] Suggestion Vincent Hanquez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Fischbacher @ 2008-01-30 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Caml-list List
Considering the noticeable increase in traffic on this list which does
not seem to be about to decline, may I suggest splitting it into
caml-impl (dealing with language implementation issues only) and
caml-list?
--
best regards,
Thomas Fischbacher
tf@functionality.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Suggestion
2008-01-30 2:01 Suggestion Thomas Fischbacher
@ 2008-01-30 13:25 ` Vincent Hanquez
2008-01-30 13:30 ` Hugo Ferreira
2008-01-30 13:38 ` Thomas Fischbacher
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Hanquez @ 2008-01-30 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Fischbacher; +Cc: Caml-list List
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 02:01:13AM +0000, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
>
> Considering the noticeable increase in traffic on this list which does
> not seem to be about to decline, may I suggest splitting it into
> caml-impl (dealing with language implementation issues only) and
> caml-list?
yes, it was so much better when that was dead (!)
--
Vincent Hanquez
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Suggestion
2008-01-30 13:25 ` [Caml-list] Suggestion Vincent Hanquez
@ 2008-01-30 13:30 ` Hugo Ferreira
2008-01-30 13:38 ` Thomas Fischbacher
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hugo Ferreira @ 2008-01-30 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Caml-list List
Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 02:01:13AM +0000, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
>> Considering the noticeable increase in traffic on this list which does
>> not seem to be about to decline, may I suggest splitting it into
>> caml-impl (dealing with language implementation issues only) and
>> caml-list?
>
> yes, it was so much better when that was dead (!)
>
How about using the ocaml developer list at google groups?
(ocaml-developer@googlegroups.com)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Suggestion
2008-01-30 13:25 ` [Caml-list] Suggestion Vincent Hanquez
2008-01-30 13:30 ` Hugo Ferreira
@ 2008-01-30 13:38 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2008-01-30 14:41 ` Peng Zang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Fischbacher @ 2008-01-30 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent Hanquez; +Cc: Caml-list List
Vincent Hanquez wrote:
>>Considering the noticeable increase in traffic on this list which does
>>not seem to be about to decline, may I suggest splitting it into
>>caml-impl (dealing with language implementation issues only) and
>>caml-list?
>
> yes, it was so much better when that was dead (!)
Frankly, there is a lot of pointless noise on the list at present
that is of no interest at all to application-minded subscribers.
--
best regards,
Thomas Fischbacher
tf@functionality.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Suggestion
2008-01-30 13:38 ` Thomas Fischbacher
@ 2008-01-30 14:41 ` Peng Zang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peng Zang @ 2008-01-30 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Caml-list List
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On the contrary. I am an application-minded subscriber and find the current
discussions extremely relevant. How OCaml will be managed/distributed and
how OCaml's package management system will be setup has a big impact on how I
do my work.
But fork to another list if it pleases you. I will follow the discussion
where ever it is.
Peng
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 08:38:42 am Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> >>Considering the noticeable increase in traffic on this list which does
> >>not seem to be about to decline, may I suggest splitting it into
> >>caml-impl (dealing with language implementation issues only) and
> >>caml-list?
> >
> > yes, it was so much better when that was dead (!)
>
> Frankly, there is a lot of pointless noise on the list at present
> that is of no interest at all to application-minded subscribers.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHoIyWfIRcEFL/JewRAkiDAJ0Yx4nD7DpLDc+3qOfJ6cwqf6Ux+gCdFWuI
w3BS6qCw8ttjcLPSR1WSzCg=
=y2M4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-30 14:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-30 2:01 Suggestion Thomas Fischbacher
2008-01-30 13:25 ` [Caml-list] Suggestion Vincent Hanquez
2008-01-30 13:30 ` Hugo Ferreira
2008-01-30 13:38 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2008-01-30 14:41 ` Peng Zang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).