From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C85DBBC1 for ; Fri, 2 May 2008 17:25:53 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmEBALTOGkhQDPIab2dsb2JhbACRYwEKBwIEBxMDmUs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,427,1204498800"; d="scan'208";a="12191450" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 02 May 2008 17:25:53 +0200 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m42FPqSs016473 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 2 May 2008 17:25:52 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmEBALTOGkhQDPIab2dsb2JhbACRYwEKBwIEBxMDmUs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,427,1204498800"; d="scan'208";a="12191449" Received: from smtp20.orange.fr ([80.12.242.26]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 02 May 2008 17:25:52 +0200 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2028.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2DEE81C000A3; Fri, 2 May 2008 17:25:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (APuteaux-154-1-12-105.w83-199.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.199.69.105]) by mwinf2028.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0132D1C00068; Fri, 2 May 2008 17:25:51 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20080502152552499.0132D1C00068@mwinf2028.orange.fr Message-ID: <481B327E.1020709@frisch.fr> Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 17:25:50 +0200 From: Alain Frisch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Hezekiah M. Carty" Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Should a /\ operator be possible? References: <20080501194149.GA30095@annexia.org> <20080501212023.GA373@annexia.org> <481ADD86.3000802@frisch.fr> <3a360f590805020811q53855ecka594f876592608f0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3a360f590805020811q53855ecka594f876592608f0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 481B3280.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; frisch:01 frisch:01 infix:01 compiler:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 alain:01 alain:01 ides:02 btw:03 perhaps:05 group:07 displaying:08 symbols:09 libraries:11 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote: > Perhaps this idea should be presented to the ocamlwizard OSP group > [1]? It may be something that they could integrate in to their IDE > tools. From what I understand of the ocamlwizard OSP (which, btw, I find excessively cool), the idea is not to provide yet another IDE, but instead to develop reusable tools/libraries that can be used by several IDEs. I don't really see what can be factored out from the task under consideration (displaying some funny symbols for `subseteq` -- once it this is allowed as an infix operator by the compiler). -- Alain