caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Raffalli <christophe.raffalli@univ-savoie.fr>
To: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Cc: peng.zang@gmail.com, caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] on objects,	equality and playing nicely with the stdlib
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 10:13:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <483E65A0.3060405@univ-savoie.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805290813.18027.jon@ffconsultancy.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2464 bytes --]

Jon Harrop a écrit :
> On Thursday 29 May 2008 05:50:33 Peng Zang wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> Recently, in building some toy games, I've started using objects.  I've
>> been pleased with them and often find the subtyping convenient.
>>
>> However, I've run into some issues with the standard physical equality of
>> objects that the (=) operator performs.  Namely, it makes several stdlib
>> modules difficult to use.  Modules that provides a polymorphic (generic)
>> interface such as Hashtbl, List, Stack, etc.. rely on the (=) operator. 
>> This is fine as long as it happens to be what I need.  The minute I
>> introduce my own equality however, things break down.
>>
>> What is the best way to go about using the stdlib (or similar) when you
>> have your own equality function?  This problem almost never shows up if you
>> just stick with basic data types, but with objects you quickly run into it.
> 
> Hi Peng,
> 
> You can use the Hashtbl.Make functor to create hash tables using your own 
> equality (and hashing) function. Other than that, you're screwed: resort to 
> cut and paste from the stdlib.
> 

Via Custom block (section 18.9.1 of the manual), you could create a functor
with the following shape (I did not check my syntax):

module type Quotient =
  type t
  type qt
  val class : t -> qt
  val get_representent : qt -> t
end

module type Equivalence =
  type t
  val compare : t -> t -> int
end

module Make_Quotient (R : Equivalence) : Quotient with type t = R.t

Such that (class x) builds a custom block with
the given compare as comparison function ...
You can add hash and serialization to the Equivalence type too ...

It is a pity we have to do that from C, this should be the default way
to bridge the gap between polymorphic comparison and specific comparison.
(and PML will provide a buildin class constructor in the near future).

Hope this helps,
Christophe


-- 
Christophe Raffalli
Universite de Savoie
Batiment Le Chablais, bureau 21
73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex

tel: (33) 4 79 75 81 03
fax: (33) 4 79 75 87 42
mail: Christophe.Raffalli@univ-savoie.fr
www: http://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/~RAFFALLI
---------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT: this mail is signed using PGP/MIME
At least Enigmail/Mozilla, mutt or evolution
can check this signature. The public key is
stored on www.keyserver.net
---------------------------------------------


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-29  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-29  4:50 Peng Zang
2008-05-29  7:13 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2008-05-29  8:13   ` Christophe Raffalli [this message]
2008-05-29 13:25     ` Peng Zang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=483E65A0.3060405@univ-savoie.fr \
    --to=christophe.raffalli@univ-savoie.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
    --cc=peng.zang@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).