From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1385BBAF for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 02:04:12 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtMBABOEQUjAXQImiGdsb2JhbACBVZA2AQEBDyCaCw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,572,1204498800"; d="scan'208";a="13030879" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2008 02:04:12 +0200 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m5104Cju016639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 02:04:12 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvoAAE+EQUjQccgFf2dsb2JhbACBVZA2AQELBQIGBxGaCw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,572,1204498800"; d="scan'208";a="13320009" Received: from lax-green-bigip-5.dreamhost.com (HELO looneymail-a3.g.dreamhost.com) ([208.113.200.5]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2008 02:04:11 +0200 Received: from Smokejumper-MBP.local (c-76-113-178-230.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [76.113.178.230]) by looneymail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DC927DDB; Sat, 31 May 2008 17:04:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4841E775.7020109@fischerventure.com> Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 19:04:05 -0500 From: Robert Fischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Jambon Cc: Fabrice Marchant , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Compose function for multiple parameters ? References: <20080531092406.093bd147@free.fr> <20080531101042.25d046ee@free.fr> <20080531180149.04e6ac5e@free.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 4841E77C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 defining:02 ops:03 parameters:03 let:03 let:03 function:08 compose:08 fischer:10 robert:13 robert:13 martin:13 between:13 but:14 difference:14 >>> Martin >> >> OK, it's far to be perfect - funny at best. But what would be the >> right way ? >> >> Defining the 2 ops : >> let ( <<- ) f g x = f (g x) >> let ( <<-- ) f g x y = f (g x y) >> >> is it better ? Many displays will turn "--" into an mdash, which will obfuscate the difference between the two operators. ~~ Robert.