>
>
>> And a secondary question : why to have two parsers (except maybe for 
>> bootstraping) ?
>
> I'm not sure I understand your question, but the OCaml and Camlp4o
> parsers use a different technology. The latter is extensible while the
> former is not.

I just think one parser technology (-pp camlp4o by default) sounds 
better to me !
This is a problem when you generate ocaml code that you must make sure 
to be compatible
with as many as possible OCaml parsers ...

Christophe
>
> -- Michel
>
>


-- 
Christophe Raffalli
Universite de Savoie
Batiment Le Chablais, bureau 21
73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex

tel: (33) 4 79 75 81 03
fax: (33) 4 79 75 87 42
mail: Christophe.Raffalli@univ-savoie.fr
www: http://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/~RAFFALLI
---------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT: this mail is signed using PGP/MIME
At least Enigmail/Mozilla, mutt or evolution 
can check this signature. The public key is
stored on www.keyserver.net
---------------------------------------------